Capture the question in context
Record the question in the customer's or teammate's words, removing names, account numbers and other private details. Note the situation and channel. The same question can need a different answer during setup than after an order has shipped.
Choose questions that are likely to recur and can be answered without exposing a particular account. A one-off case with private details generally belongs in that case record.
Write an answer someone can check
Give the direct answer first, followed by the steps or source needed to act. If the answer changes with timing, account status or another condition, say so. Split the entry if two situations need materially different answers.
Name the role that can approve the entry and a trigger for review, such as a change to the shipping process. Use draft, approved, needs review and retired to show the current state. A review date is a reminder, not evidence that someone performed the review.
- Capture the question and remove identifying details.
- Draft the answer against its current procedure or source.
- Have the responsible owner check it and record the review trigger.
A fictional question about a sample package
In the fictional register, a customer asks when a sample package will ship. For a confirmed order whose record says Thursday, the example reply gives that date and says tracking will follow carrier collection. If the order has no date or a conflicting date, the order owner needs to check it.
A logo upload question and an appointment-change question have their own fictional owners and review triggers. The original worksheet retains all three entries. Check your own order and procedure before using an answer with a customer.
Maintain the answers in daily work
Keep the register where people who answer questions can find it. When a new question does not fit an existing answer, decide whether it needs a new entry or a change to the current one.
Review entries marked for attention, outdated links and questions the team still answers from memory. Retire guidance when the underlying service or process has changed.
Prepare FAQ drafts with Areinum
Areinum Assistant can help group the questions you provide and draft answers from the relevant approved procedures. The owner checks each answer and decides whether it is ready to share.
See the example
FAQ Entry and Review Register
The questions, company names, answers, roles, and dates in the worked example are fictional.
| Question as asked | Audience | Approved answer | Steps or source | Escalate when | Owner role | Review trigger | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When will my sample package ship? | Customer with a confirmed order | The order record lists Thursday as the ship date. We will send tracking after carrier collection. | Order record and shipping procedure | The order record has no date or shows a different date. | Order support lead | After a shipping-process change | Approved example |
| How do I send a replacement logo file? | New client | Use the secure project upload link in your welcome note. If you cannot open it, reply to your project contact. | Welcome note and file intake instructions | The link is missing or the file contains sensitive material requiring a different route. | Client coordinator | When upload instructions change | Needs owner check |
| Can I change the appointment time? | Existing customer | Reply with two suitable times and the coordinator will confirm which one is available. | Scheduling procedure | The current appointment is within one business day. | Scheduling lead | After calendar or service-hour changes | Draft example |
- Keep the original wording of the question after removing identifying details, then write an answer that a named owner has checked.
- Treat a review trigger as a prompt to verify the answer. Do not treat an old review date or a blank field as current approval.
- Use separate rows when the answer changes with the reader's situation, and keep account-specific answers in the appropriate private record.
Limits of this method
- The source is a single self-reported example of FAQ and video use. It does not establish prevalence, effectiveness, or willingness to pay.
- The example answer should not be copied into a real customer reply without checking the relevant order and current company procedure.
Questions you may have
Should we add a question that has only been asked once?
Consider whether it is likely to recur and whether a reusable answer can be written without revealing private case details.
What if the answer depends on an individual order?
Explain the general process in the FAQ and check the particular order before giving a date or other account-specific answer.
Who keeps an FAQ entry current?
Name an owner who can check the source, and record a review date or a trigger tied to a process change.
Sources and further reading
- CLIENT (Canadian business owner) answering all your questions
One self-described owner says recurring customer questions led to updates to support templates and a website FAQ, and describes recording a video for a repeated new-hire question.
This single self-report does not establish prevalence or the effectiveness of the proposed register.
In the original post, a self-described owner says repeated customer questions led to updates to support templates and the website FAQ, and says a recurring new-hire question was answered with a recorded video.
This is one unverified Reddit self-report. The poster's identity, prevalence of the problem, and willingness to buy a solution are unknown; comments are not used as evidence.
2026-10-18
The demo is in English. Access may need to be arranged.
Explore the demo